An appraisal of the early impact of COVID-19 on affordable housing finance in Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030

Alharbi, R (2024) An appraisal of the early impact of COVID-19 on affordable housing finance in Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 42(4), pp. 751-767. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Affordable housing provision is one of the visions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), as highlighted in Vision 2030. For about 21 months now, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has ravaged the world and has increased the level of economic crisis and financial uncertainty to achieve planned projects. Studies investigating the reality of how the COVID-19 pandemic may streamline the chances of achieving affordable housing for all in 2030 are scarce. Thus, this study examined the relevance of affordable housing, the perceived impact of COVID-19 on affordable housing and proffered measures to promote affordable housing finance in Vision 2030. Design/methodology/approach: Medina, Riyadh and Al Qassim were the participants' cities engaged via panel interviews and supported by existing relevant Vision 2030 documents. The Delphi method was adopted to explore the government officials, financial operators (bankers), academicians and employees' opinions, and the analysed data presented in themes. Findings: Findings show that SA Vision 2030 blueprint expresses an exemplary country in all ramifications, including affordable housing finance for the citizens. Findings reveal that the COVID-19 pandemic threatens SA affordable housing finance Vision 2030. The increased housing shortage, high construction housing cost, increased foreclosures, increased eviction, possible homelessness, financial instability and vulnerability emerged as the perceived impact of COVID-19 on affordable housing finance in Vision 2030. Refinancing housing loans to boost Vision 2030, forbearance to promote Vision 2030, improve payment relief, among others, emerged as measures to promote affordable housing in the post-COVID-19 era. Research limitations/implications: The research only identified the possible negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on affordable housing finance in Vision 2030 and proffered policy solutions from the engaged participants' perspective. Also, the study covered three cities (Medina, Riyadh and Al Qassim). The suggestions that will emerge from this research may be adopted to address other sectors captured in Vision 2030 that are critical and hit by the ravaging pandemic. Practical implications: Measures such as refinancing mortgages and strengthening government housing agencies will promote affordable housing for Vision 2030 if the relevant policymakers and mortgage institutions are well implemented. Originality/value: This research identified the perceived early threats from the COVID-19 pandemic that could affect affordable housing transformation in Vision 2030 from the participants' perspective. Studies regarding COVID-19 and affordable housing in Vision 2030 are very few.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: gulf country; mortgage; pandemic; shelter; sustainable development; panel interview; Delphi method
Index terms: coronavirus, strengthening, eviction, agency, appraisal, sustainable development, COVID-19, vulnerability, transformation, housing, methodology, affordable housing, documents, interview, Saudi Arabia, mortgage, pandemic, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Delphi method
Subjects: factor and component analysis, environmental hazards, business, data collection methods, professional development, health conditions and diseases, structural engineering, health safety and environment, liability law, health risk and incident analysis, construction type, research methods, economic analysis, Geography, sociology
Topics: Geographical Context, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here