Effective feedback and systematic reflection in design cost estimating

Lowe, D J (1998) Effective feedback and systematic reflection in design cost estimating. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.

Abstract

The use of an effective feedback system is considered to influence the quality of estimates. Similarly, it is held that a means of monitoring performance should be incorporated into any forecasting system. Moreover, on an individual basis, systematic reflection is considered crucial for effective experiential learning. It is suggested that only through some process of systematic reflection may a professional achieve growth and self-renewal. This paper examines the application of effective feedback systems and systematic reflection by early stage design cost estimators. The findings from a fully structured interview survey of experienced early stage design cost estimators (n = 84) and a questionnaire survey of student quantity surveyors (n = 331) are presented. Despite the recommendations of previous studies, many practitioners still have inadequate feedback systems. Many either did not systematically reflect on the outcomes of estimates, or used self-assessment as the sole means of evaluation. Also, practitioners had significantly lower Reflective Observation learning style scores when compared to the student sample, while their declared approach to learning exhibited a reluctance for self-assessment or self-appraisal. Finally, on an organizational basis both practitioners and student quantity surveyors gave a low rating to the provision of constructive feedback by the organization on their performance.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: quantity surveyors; design cost estimating; feedback systems; systematic reflection; experiential learning
Index terms: forecasting, experiential learning, interview, quantity surveying, survey, design cost, learning style, practitioner, questionnaire, estimator, monitoring, reflection, renewal, estimating, estimate, appraisal
Subjects: professional development, factor and component analysis, renovation and retrofit, economics, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, learning methods, control systems, practitioner, profession, data collection methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Site Management, Education
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here