Defects in Malaysian hospital buildings

Jesumoroti, C; Olanrewaju, A and Khor, S C (2024) Defects in Malaysian hospital buildings. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 42(5), pp. 835-856. ISSN 2398-4708

Abstract

Purpose: Hospital building maintenance management constitutes a pertinent issue of global concern for all healthcare stakeholders. In Malaysia, the maintenance management of hospital buildings is instrumental to the Government’s goal of providing efficient healthcare services to the Government's citizenry. However, there is a paucity of studies that have comprehensively explored all dimensions of hospital building defects in relation to maintenance management. Consequently, this study seeks to evaluate the defects of hospital buildings in Malaysia with the aim of proffering viable solutions for the rectification and prevention of the issue. Design/methodology/approach: The study utilised a quantitative approach for data collection. Findings: The findings indicated that cracked floors, floor tile failures, wall tiles failure, blocked water closets, and damaged windows were some of the flaws that degrade hospital buildings. The study’s outcomes reveal that defects not only deface the aesthetic appearance of hospital buildings but also inhibit the functionality of the buildings and depreciate the overall satisfaction. Research limitations/implications: Considering the indispensable role of hospital buildings in the grand scheme of healthcare service provision and ensuring the well-being of people, the issue of defects necessitates an urgent re-evaluation of the maintenance management practices of hospital buildings in Malaysia. Previous studies on the maintenance management of hospital buildings in Malaysia have focused primarily on design, safety, and construction. Practical implications: This is particularly important because defects in hospital buildings across the country have recently led to incessant ceiling collapses, fire outbreaks, ceiling, roof collapses, and other structural failures. These problems are typically the result of poor maintenance management, exacerbated by poor design and construction. These disasters pose significant risks to the lives of hospital building users. Originality/value: This study offers invaluable insights for maintenance organisations and maintenance department staff who are genuinely interested in improving hospital buildings’ maintenance management to optimise staff's performance and enhance the user satisfaction of hospital buildings in Malaysia and globally.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: amenities; critical success factors; implementation; requirements; services; structural failure
Index terms: aesthetic, Malaysia, maintenance management, outbreak, satisfaction, roof, dimension, prevention, implementation, design and construction, functionality, building defect, building maintenance, critical success factor, window, user satisfaction, methodology, well-being
Subjects: Geography, financial risk, factor and component analysis, design practice, architectural elements, health risk and incident analysis, maintenance engineering, research methods, contractual arrangements, professional practice, health monitoring assessment and metrics, project delivery, design features, control systems, construction type, client relations, mental health and wellbeing
Topics: Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here