McGeorge, D; Eng, C S and Plenty, T (1998) A public sector approach to risk management as part of a total asset management strategy. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.
Abstract
There is a clear willingness on the part of public sector clients to strive for best practice in the management of their assets. This is evidenced through initiatives such as those undertaken by the Department of Public Works and Services (DPWS) New South Wales, in its total asset management strategy. A recent research project undertaken by the Department of Building at the University of Newcastle in co-operation with DPWS reviewed and evaluated risk management practices in public sector projects with respect to stated policy, current total asset management strategy and best practice benchmarks. The study had two objectives firstly to compare the DPWS risk management guidelines against other industry and theoretical risk management models and, secondly, to obtain feedback on current risk management practices within the DPWS , with particular reference to the application of the risk management processes contained in the Total Asset Management Manual (TAMM). The study of risk management models demonstrated that the DPWS model had comparable features to private sector models. The review of DPWS risk management processes raised a numbers issues related to the inclusion of key stakeholders in the decision making process in complex public sector projects.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | best practice; cultural shift; total asset management; risk management; stakeholder involvement |
| Index terms: | New South Wales, risk management, best practice, public work, total asset management, stakeholder involvement, public sector, decision-making process, public-sector client, private sector, strategy |
| Subjects: | business, risk assessment, participation process, infrastructure engineering, Geography, management, industry analysis, administrative law, asset management, decision analysis, sociology |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here