Design for safety in construction: A study of design professionals in Kuwait

Sharar, M; Agyekum, K; Manu, P; Che Ibrahim, C K I; Mahamadu, A M; Antwi-Afari, M F and Danso, F O (2024) Design for safety in construction: A study of design professionals in Kuwait. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 42(4), pp. 596-617. ISSN 23984708

Abstract

Purpose: Design for safety (DfS), also known as prevention through design (PtD), is a concept that mitigates accidents and hazards through considerations during the design stage of building projects. The literature provides much information on this concept, but such information is only limited to a few developed countries such as the UK, the USA and Australia. There is limited insight into DfS implementation in the construction industry of several countries, including countries in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) such as Kuwait. Therefore, this study investigates DfS implementation among design professionals in the Kuwait construction industry. Design/methodology/approach: The study used a questionnaire survey to obtain data from design professionals. The data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics (i.e. analysis of variance and t-test). Findings: The results revealed that DfS awareness among design professionals is very high; there is a very high willingness among design professionals to apply the concept, and design professionals generally view DfS implementation as important. Despite these, the frequency of implementation of DfS practices is generally moderate. In addition, the results revealed that though there is a high interest in DfS training among the design professionals, their actual engagement in training is low. The results also suggest some association between the frequency of engagement in the DfS practices and designers' DfS awareness, training and education. DfS related regulations, industry guidance, formal education and training are considered by design professionals to have the greatest influence on DfS implementation in Kuwait. Originality/Value: These emerging findings both mirror and contradict aspects of the outcomes of previous DfS studies in other countries. Furthermore, the findings from this study provide insights into a less investigated area regarding work-related health and safety in the GCC region. It offers new and additional information and insights into the current state-of-the-art DfS implementation in the construction industry in Kuwait. In view of the findings, joined-up efforts by government, industry and academia are needed to enhance DfS implementation by design professionals in Kuwait.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; design; design for safety; health and safety; questionaire survey
Index terms: designer, Australia, variance, statistics, construction industry, prevention, implementation, education and training, academia, survey, health and safety, Gulf cooperation council, design for safety, methodology, Kuwait, questionnaire, design stage, state of the art, regulation, developed country
Subjects: mathematical modelling, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, profession, institutional frameworks, professional practice, contractual arrangements, research methods, development economics, financial risk, Geography, health safety and environment, professional education, educational institutions, measurement and scaling, political science, industry analysis
Topics: Education, International Construction, Design Practice, Governance, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here