Stellacci, S; Domingos, L and Resende, R (2024) Integrated computational approaches for energy retrofit of historical buildings in extreme climate environments. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 42(1), pp. 114-132. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to test the effectiveness of integrating Grasshopper 3D and measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique (M-MACBETH) for building energy simulation analysis within a virtual environment. Set of energy retrofitting solutions is evaluated against performance-based criteria (energy consumption, weight and carbon footprint), and considering the preservation of the cultural value of the building, its architectural and spatial configuration. Design/methodology/approach: This research addresses the building energy performance analysis before and after the design of retrofitting solutions in extreme climate environments (2030–2100). The proposed model integrates data obtained from an advanced parametric tool (Grasshopper) and a multi-criteria decision analysis (M-MACBETH) to score different energy retrofitting solutions against energy consumption, weight, carbon footprint and impact on architectural configuration. The proposed model is tested for predicting the performance of a traditional timber-framed dwelling in a historic parish in Lisbon. The performance of distinct solutions is compared in digitally simulated climate conditions (design scenarios) considering different criteria weights. Findings: This study shows the importance of conducting building energy simulation linking physical and digital environments and then, identifying a set of evaluation criteria in the analysed context. Architects, environmental engineers and urban planners should use computational environment in the development design phase to identify design solutions and compare their expected impact on the building configuration and performance-based behaviour. Research limitations/implications: The unavailability of local weather data (EnergyPlus Weather File (EPW) file), the high time-resource effort, and the number/type of the energy retrofit measures tested in this research limit the scope of this study. In energy simulation procedures, the baseline generally covers a period of thirty, ten or five years. In this research, due to the fact that weather data is unavailable in the format required in the simulation process (.EPW file), the input data in the baseline is the average climatic data from EnergyPlus (2022). Additionally, this workflow is time-consuming due to the low interoperability of the software. Grasshopper requires a high-skilled analyst to obtain accurate results. To calculate the values for the energy consumption, i.e. the values of energy per day of simulation, all the values given per hour are manually summed. The values of weight are obtained by calculating the amount of material required (whose dimensions are provided by Grasshopper), while the amount of carbon footprint is calculated per kg of material. Then this set of data is introduced into M-MACBETH. Another relevant limitation is related to the techniques proposed for retrofitting this case study, all based on wood-fibre boards. Practical implications: The proposed method for energy simulation and climate change adaptation can be applied to other historic buildings considering different evaluation criteria and context-based priorities. Social implications: Context-based adaptation measures of the built environment are necessary for the coming years due to the projected extreme temperature changes following the 2015 Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda. Built environments include historical sites that represent irreplaceable cultural legacies and factors of the community's identity to be preserved over time. Originality/value: This study shows the importance of conducting building energy simulation using physical and digital environments. Computational environment should be used during the development design phase by architects, engineers and urban planners to rank design solutions against a set of performance criteria and compare the expected impact on the building configuration and performance-based behaviour. This study integrates Grasshopper 3D and M-MACBETH.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building energy retrofit; climate change adaption; historic built environment; integrated computational tools; parametric modelling tools |
| Index terms: | case study, carbon footprint, adaptation, energyplus, wood, engineer, planner, architect, effectiveness, built environment, design phase, identity, energy consumption, Paris, building energy simulation, Lisbon, interoperability, energy performance, dimension, modelling, multi-criteria decision analysis, energy retrofitting, virtual environment, performance criteria, environmental engineer, energy simulation, evaluation technique, historic building, configuration, methodology, retrofitting, weather, climate change, historical building, performance-based, workflow, spatial configuration |
| Subjects: | architectural design, health monitoring assessment and metrics, analytical methods, energy systems, environmental science, professional practice, modelling and simulation, climate science, environmental impact, user focus, virtual reality, air quality, profession, construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, systems engineering, systems and processes, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, decision analysis, Geography, performance management, research methods, traditional and composite building materials, performance measurement, design practice, renovation and retrofit, management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here