Zhalmurziyeva, K; Tokbolat, S; Durdyev, S; Mustafa, M Y and Karaca, F (2024) Assessment of sustainability indicators for urban water infrastructure in a developing country. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 42(3), pp. 337-351. ISSN 23984708
Abstract
Purpose: This research aims to study a broad range of sustainability aspects and develop a set of indicators with their subjective relevance to each of the sustainability dimensions that will help to improve the sustainability level of the water system of Nur-Sultan (Kazakhstan). Design/methodology/approach: The broader list of indicators (which were identified through a thorough review of the literature) was assessed by water-related industry professionals and experts who were asked to assess the compliance of suggested indicators to five criteria of sustainability using a Likert scale. Findings: It was found that the highest-ranked indicators across all five categories were mainly related to the chemical and physical quality of water, followed by availability of individual water meters as well as water supply tariffs' adjustment to users' income, and issues of ageing infrastructure. The lowest-ranked indicators among all categories were mainly related to investments into research and development, water management and awareness, feedback systems and flexibility. The least ranked indicators are seen to be more related to the scenarios when basic needs are covered and the stakeholders have extra time and resources for advancing the levels of water infrastructure sustainability. Practical implications: The ranked and categorized indicators can be used as a powerful decision-making tool to improve the sustainability of the water system of Nur-Sultan or any other city in a developing country. Originality/value: By conducting this study, it was aimed to address the aforementioned gap in the field in terms of running a wider scope assessment of indicators rather than looking at conventional environmental and socio-economic aspects. This provides novelty to the study, especially in the context of developing countries that need more guidance in terms of sustainable development of the water-related infrastructure.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainability dimensions; sustainability indicators; urban water infrastructure; water use |
| Index terms: | Kazakhstan, research and development, methodology, decision-making, Likert scale, developing country, compliance, water supply, sustainability indicator, sustainable development, income, sustainability aspect, dimension, water management, infrastructure sustainability |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, environmental resource management, economic analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, sustainability assessment, research methods, health safety and environment, Geography, development economics, decision analysis, research management, sustainable engineering, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | International Construction, Risk Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here