Cho, C-S; Mazze, C E; Dika, S L and Gehrig, G B (2015) Enhancing construction education: Implementing habitat for humanity projects as service-learning for construction materials. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11(1), pp. 4-20. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Service-learning is considered a valuable approach in applying concepts from the higher education classroom in real-world settings, and has become quite common in some disciplines. Engineering educators in the United States are making efforts to incorporate service-learning activities and to study their benefits for student learning and engagement. This article describes the design and results of implementing a Habitat for Humanity service-learning project in an introductory construction materials course. Study results collected from two semesters of service-learning implementation show students respond positively to the hands-on active learning of real-world activities related to the course content. Service-learning activities in particular were not only found to enhance student learning and interpersonal skills, but also increase student awareness of their intended profession and society as a whole. Overall, students reported positive perceptions of the service-learning experience and its contribution to their learning of course concepts.; Service-learning is considered a valuable approach in applying concepts from the higher education classroom in real-world settings, and has become quite common in some disciplines. Engineering educators in the United States are making efforts to incorporate service-learning activities and to study their benefits for student learning and engagement. This article describes the design and results of implementing a Habitat for Humanity service-learning project in an introductory construction materials course. Study results collected from two semesters of service-learning implementation show students respond positively to the hands-on active learning of real-world activities related to the course content. Service-learning activities in particular were not only found to enhance student learning and interpersonal skills, but also increase student awareness of their intended profession and society as a whole. Overall, students reported positive perceptions of the service-learning experience and its contribution to their learning of course concepts.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | service project; habitat for humanity; active learning; service learning; experiential learning; pedagogy; teaching methods; engineering schools; building materials; perceptions; organizational learning |
| Index terms: | organizational learning, experiential learning, United States, society, service learning, interpersonal skill, construction education, classroom, engineering school, active learning, Habitat for Humanity, higher education, service project, learning experience, implementation, profession, construction material, teaching method, pedagogy, building material |
| Subjects: | building materials, contractual arrangements, construction type, learning methods, human factors and perception, institututions, educational institutions, non-governmental organizations, professional education, communities and social development, Geography, teaching methods, production management, professional development |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Education, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here