Clevenger, C M; Ozbek, M E; Fanning, B and Vonfeldt, S (2015) Case study of work-based learning involving BIM for infrastructure in support of graduate construction research. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11(3), pp. 163-178. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Internships are a critical and valuable element in construction education. They provide work-based learning through real-world project experience. Yet, the United States lags behind Europe and other countries in the exploration of research opportunities during work-based learning experiences. Within construction education in the United States, goals and focus of graduate and undergraduate internships differ, and little research exists documenting best practices for graduate internships. This article presents a case study of a successful three-way partnership between industry, faculty, and students that highlights the benefits and opportunities of Masters level graduate internships to generate valuable, applied research. While undergraduate construction internships focus primarily on professional training, graduate construction internships present a unique multi-faceted opportunity to deliver meaningful industry-supported research, increasing the value of the graduate-level educational experience for multiple stakeholders. Industry benefits from cost effective, high quality and objective analysis and feedback. Faculty benefit from timely research questions, access to data, and financial partnering. Finally, graduate students benefit from greater professional exposure and mentorship, unique work-based research, and higher confidence that their research will be relevant and applicable. The documented case study generates a framework where graduate-internships enhance master level construction education in the United States and beyond.; Internships are a critical and valuable element in construction education. They provide work-based learning through real-world project experience. Yet, the United States lags behind Europe and other countries in the exploration of research opportunities during work-based learning experiences. Within construction education in the United States, goals and focus of graduate and undergraduate internships differ, and little research exists documenting best practices for graduate internships. This article presents a case study of a successful three-way partnership between industry, faculty, and students that highlights the benefits and opportunities of Masters level graduate internships to generate valuable, applied research. While undergraduate construction internships focus primarily on professional training, graduate construction internships present a unique multi-faceted opportunity to deliver meaningful industry-supported research, increasing the value of the graduate-level educational experience for multiple stakeholders. Industry benefits from cost effective, high quality and objective analysis and feedback. Faculty benefit from timely research questions, access to data, and financial partnering. Finally, graduate students benefit from greater professional exposure and mentorship, unique work-based research, and higher confidence that their research will be relevant and applicable. The documented case study generates a framework where graduate-internships enhance master level construction education in the United States and beyond.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | internship programs; construction education; industry-driven research; applied research; graduate education; work-based learning; learning; internships; higher education; best practice; construction industry; graduate studies |
| Index terms: | higher education, graduate study, partnership, Europe, case study, partnering, work-based learning, construction industry, best practice, undergraduate, graduate education, industry-driven research, United States, internship, exposure, graduate student, program, exploration, construction education |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, higher education, educational institutions, professional education, partnership management, professional development, Geography, software systems, public and environmental health, physical geography and landforms, curriculum development, environmental resource management, curriculum design, learning methods, business, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Education, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here