Mootanah, D P (1998) Developing an integrated risk and value management framework for construction project management. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.
Abstract
The management of risk and the search for best value for money in the UK construction industry have been the subject of many investigations over the last decade, as clients and the industry as a whole realized that there is indeed much room for improvement. Currently, many construction project management consultants offer value and risk management services either separately or combined within a broad project management framework. This paper will demonstrate how risk and value management methodologies can be interfaced both theoretically and in practice and will propose a framework for integrated value and risk management within construction project management. Before looking at the underlying interface between risk and value management, a review of the evolution of value and risk management frameworks is carried out to situate the theoretical context and to explain the basis for developing the integrated framework. Numerous instances of risk consideration within different value management frameworks are explained and compared. A tentative integrated framework is then developed from the concepts and variables identified from the review of literature and existing practices. This integrated framework is currently being evaluated by means of a mixed-methodological research, which is outlined in the paper.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; project management; risk management; value management; systems thinking |
| Index terms: | systems thinking, construction industry, project management, best value, methodology, evolution, investigation, construction project management, risk management, value management |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, research methods, management, project management theory and practice, analytical methods, bidding, environmental science, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Value Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here