Bigelow, B F; Bilbo, D; Ritter, L; Mathew, M and Elliott, J W (2016) An evaluation of factors for retaining female students in construction management programs. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 12(1), pp. 18-36. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The under-representation of women in construction necessitates academia's understanding of what influences a female's decision to remain in a construction management (CM) program. Many factors that retain women in CM programs have been identified. Understanding which of these factors are most influential is an important step towards increasing the number of women in CM. This study used a quantitative approach to explore the factors that have been previously identified to retain female students in CM programs; however, qualitative methods were also used to identify additional retention factors. The research was completed through a self-administered, researcher-designed survey of female CM students at five major universities. The results provide a prioritized ranking of the factors identified to retain female students. They indicated that the most positively influential factors for females to remain in a CM undergraduate degree program are: the community of students, lab classes, internships, innovation in the classroom, and student organizations. Job/Career opportunities also emerged as a positively influential factor for retention of female students that was previously not identified in the literature.; The under-representation of women in construction necessitates academia's understanding of what influences a female's decision to remain in a construction management (CM) program. Many factors that retain women in CM programs have been identified. Understanding which of these factors are most influential is an important step towards increasing the number of women in CM. This study used a quantitative approach to explore the factors that have been previously identified to retain female students in CM programs; however, qualitative methods were also used to identify additional retention factors. The research was completed through a self-administered, researcher-designed survey of female CM students at five major universities. The results provide a prioritized ranking of the factors identified to retain female students. They indicated that the most positively influential factors for females to remain in a CM undergraduate degree program are: the community of students, lab classes, internships, innovation in the classroom, and student organizations. Job/Career opportunities also emerged as a positively influential factor for retention of female students that was previously not identified in the literature.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | internships; mentoring; construction education; retention; women in construction; higher education; females; mentoring programs; construction industry |
| Index terms: | retention, higher education, undergraduate, academia, women, construction industry, survey, qualitative method, classroom, career, construction education, influential factor, program, internship, mentoring |
| Subjects: | training, curriculum development, research design and methodology, data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, professional education, educational institutions, sociology, industry analysis, software systems, management, professional development |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Human Resources, Education, Research Practice, Information Management, Risk Management, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here