El-Mashaleh, M S; Hyari, K H; Bdour, A N and Rababeh, S M (2016) A multi-attribute decision-making model for construction enterprise resource planning system selection. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 12(1), pp. 66-79. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are increasingly becoming essential business technologies. Selection of the optimal ERP system among numerous alternatives is regarded as a major challenge for the decision-maker. This choice is complicated by multiple attributes that the decision-maker needs to consider when evaluating different ERP options. The purpose of this article is to propose a multi-attribute decision-making model for ERP system selection based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). The strengths of the proposed DEA model include the input-output framework, which allows decision-makers to incorporate multiple attributes when evaluating different ERP options. These attributes are not required to be congruent. They can be measured by such criteria as monetary sums, time, or subjective score. Additionally, DEA can accommodate a large number of options (i.e., ERP systems) and variables (i.e., attributes). The proposed approach was utilized by a construction contractor to select the optimal ERP option out of eleven alternatives. During the evaluation process, the decision-maker incorporated six attributes to make the decision. These considered attributes are total cost, implementation schedule, functionality, user friendliness, customization capability, and service and support quality. Sensitivity analysis proved that the proposed model is stable and robust.; Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are increasingly becoming essential business technologies. Selection of the optimal ERP system among numerous alternatives is regarded as a major challenge for the decision-maker. This choice is complicated by multiple attributes that the decision-maker needs to consider when evaluating different ERP options. The purpose of this article is to propose a multi-attribute decision-making model for ERP system selection based on data envelopment analysis (DEA). The strengths of the proposed DEA model include the input-output framework, which allows decision-makers to incorporate multiple attributes when evaluating different ERP options. These attributes are not required to be congruent. They can be measured by such criteria as monetary sums, time, or subjective score. Additionally, DEA can accommodate a large number of options (i.e., ERP systems) and variables (i.e., attributes). The proposed approach was utilized by a construction contractor to select the optimal ERP option out of eleven alternatives. During the evaluation process, the decision-maker incorporated six attributes to make the decision. These considered attributes are total cost, implementation schedule, functionality, user friendliness, customization capability, and service and support quality. Sensitivity analysis proved that the proposed model is stable and robust.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | enterprise resource planning; information technology; decision support system; data envelopment analysis; decision making; construction |
| Index terms: | option, data envelopment analysis, implementation, becoming, customization, enterprise resource planning, decision-making, information technology, construction contractor, sensitivity analysis, decision support, functionality |
| Subjects: | computing systems, practitioner, design features, construction manufacturing, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, decision analysis, environmental hazards, philosophical process, computer science |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Design Practice, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here