Lee, N; Lee, L W and Kovel, J (2016) An experimental study of instructional pedagogies to teach math-related content knowledge in construction management education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 12(4), pp. 255-269. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
The capability for quantitative thought and expression is essential in the daily work of the construction industry. The National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium (NASDCTEc) recognizes a keen understanding of mathematics as one of the most critical skills required in the construction management career field. Most construction management programs require students to take several prerequisite math courses. However, a high percentage of students have difficulty in applying their math skills to construction-related problems. The main question in this research was "what is the most effective pedagogical approach to helping students master the most needed math skills for construction management?" Three different instructional models (traditional lecture, problem-based learning, and flipped classroom) were compared to study improvement levels in student mastery of math skills. An experimental study was conducted in a state university. Fifty-two students were assigned to three groups. The same pre- and post-tests were performed in each group and the test results were measured and compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Data analyses revealed that the problem-based learning approach produced the most improvement. This article also offers additional insight about that teaching method and student learning in construction management education.;The capability for quantitative thought and expression is essential in the daily work of the construction industry. The National Association of State Directors of Career Technical Education Consortium (NASDCTEc) recognizes a keen understanding of mathematics as one of the most critical skills required in the construction management career field. Most construction management programs require students to take several prerequisite math courses. However, a high percentage of students have difficulty in applying their math skills to construction-related problems. The main question in this research was "what is the most effective pedagogical approach to helping students master the most needed math skills for construction management?" Three different instructional models (traditional lecture, problem-based learning, and flipped classroom) were compared to study improvement levels in student mastery of math skills. An experimental study was conducted in a state university. Fifty-two students were assigned to three groups. The same pre- and post-tests were performed in each group and the test results were measured and compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Data analyses revealed that the problem-based learning approach produced the most improvement. This article also offers additional insight about that teaching method and student learning in construction management education.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | instructional models; student-centered pedagogies; construction mathematics; problem based learning; university students; education; variance analysis; construction industry |
| Index terms: | instructional model, program, career, variance analysis, classroom, university student, data analysis, experiment, construction management education, student-centered pedagogy, problem-based learning, teaching method, pedagogy, construction industry, consortium, variance |
| Subjects: | software systems, teaching methods, professional development, partnership management, measurement and scaling, professional education, industry analysis, statistical analysis, construction type, data collection methods, curriculum design, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Education, Information Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here