A schema of trust building attributes and their corresponding integrated project delivery traits

Pishdad-Bozorgi, P and Beliveau, Y J (2016) A schema of trust building attributes and their corresponding integrated project delivery traits. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 12(2), pp. 142-160. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Trust-based relationship is critical in building an integrated and collaborative team. Relational contracting like Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is centered on the notion of trust and aims to further foster trust and collaboration. This research offers an in-depth analysis on how trust-building attributes are supported and leveraged by IPD traits. All the distinguishing traits of IPD are found effective in building trust. A few examples of these trust-building traits are: establishment of a core IPD team, jointly developed goals, collaborative decision-making, shared risks and rewards, and open communication. Additionally, IPD utilizes relational clauses and behavioral principles to influence an individual's values and culture of trust. The research demonstrates that while IPD is effective in promoting trust, it does not warrant trust-based relationships, as the contract and team members' characteristics also play critical roles in building trust. The key to success of IPD is establishing a clearly defined contact which equitably aligns efforts and rewards, and selecting the collaborative partners who have an established trust-based relationships and are committed to the IPD principles. The manuscript contributes to the body of knowledge by developing a schema of trust-building attributes and their corresponding IPD traits.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: partnerships; trust; collaboration; construction industry
Index terms: relational contracting, partnership, construction industry, integrated project delivery, collaboration, decision-making, body of knowledge, trust-building
Subjects: industry analysis, decision analysis, partnership management, management, knowledge management, contractual arrangements, psychology
Topics: Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here