Challenges of motivating postgraduate built environment online teaching and learning practice workgroups to adopt innovation

Moore, D R and Fisher, T (2017) Challenges of motivating postgraduate built environment online teaching and learning practice workgroups to adopt innovation. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 13(3), pp. 225-47. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Successful implementation of teaching and learning (T&L) innovation within an e-learning context in higher education institutions involves overcoming challenges. A key component of success in this regard is the level of motivation of those tasked with addressing challenges. This research project sought to identify the extent to which the level of support (motivation to adopt) for e-learning innovation implementation varied between individuals and over time. The level of support evidenced by individual lecturers (functioning as members of a workgroup) was assessed throughout a pilot study and a subsequent roll-out project implementing specific best practice T&L innovations. The methodology applied was determined on the basis of relevance to the focus of the project and the need for pragmatism within the constraints applicable. Nonetheless, the findings are in line with expectations established within relevant literature and are the basis of recommended actions to be considered by those undertaking e-learning innovation implementation projects. While the research is primarily focused on improving the motivation of lecturers exhibiting antagonistic behaviors, there is also consideration of the need to gain student support for any proposed T&L innovations. The identification of best practice T&L innovations is not an objective of the article.;Successful implementation of teaching and learning (T&L) innovation within an e-learning context in higher education institutions involves overcoming challenges. A key component of success in this regard is the level of motivation of those tasked with addressing challenges. This research project sought to identify the extent to which the level of support (motivation to adopt) for e-learning innovation implementation varied between individuals and over time. The level of support evidenced by individual lecturers (functioning as members of a workgroup) was assessed throughout a pilot study and a subsequent roll-out project implementing specific best practice T&L innovations. The methodology applied was determined on the basis of relevance to the focus of the project and the need for pragmatism within the constraints applicable. Nonetheless, the findings are in line with expectations established within relevant literature and are the basis of recommended actions to be considered by those undertaking e-learning innovation implementation projects. While the research is primarily focused on improving the motivation of lecturers exhibiting antagonistic behaviors, there is also consideration of the need to gain student support for any proposed T&L innovations. The identification of best practice T&L innovations is not an objective of the article.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: education institutions; challenges; e-learning; innovation; motivation; psychological contract
Index terms: best practice, psychological contract, built environment, implementation, higher education institution, e-learning, methodology, postgraduate, education institution, pragmatism, motivation
Subjects: higher education, infrastructure and transport systems, philosophical concept, educational institutions, educational technology, research methods, contractual arrangements, psychology, business
Topics: Urban Studies, Human Resources, Education, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here