'Thank you for taking the time to understand': A critical reflection on peer-led interventions in early experiences of higher education

Morton, N; Vincent, W; Schiessel Harvey, N and Curzon, R (2017) 'Thank you for taking the time to understand': A critical reflection on peer-led interventions in early experiences of higher education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 13(3), pp. 163-79. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Supporting students through their transition into Higher Education is a vital function of any successful university business. An interconnected series of interventions have been tested at Birmingham City University, UK, as part of a national project, based on peer-led models of student support piloted in the Built Environment school. We reflect in particular upon our pre-arrival mentoring program, our work to reach out to disengaged students, and our broader efforts to build connected student communities, and show that challenges in both academic and social spheres can be tackled through well designed interventions. In part this work has been enabled through a new staff post, that of Graduate Student Success Advisors. Survey work with the pilot cohort has indicated steadily rising and above sector average levels of engagement and self-confidence, and the interventions described are now part of an embedded approach to supporting students through the early stages of their studies, across all subject areas in our department.;Supporting students through their transition into Higher Education is a vital function of any successful university business. An interconnected series of interventions have been tested at Birmingham City University, UK, as part of a national project, based on peer-led models of student support piloted in the Built Environment school. We reflect in particular upon our pre-arrival mentoring program, our work to reach out to disengaged students, and our broader efforts to build connected student communities, and show that challenges in both academic and social spheres can be tackled through well designed interventions. In part this work has been enabled through a new staff post, that of Graduate Student Success Advisors. Survey work with the pilot cohort has indicated steadily rising and above sector average levels of engagement and self-confidence, and the interventions described are now part of an embedded approach to supporting students through the early stages of their studies, across all subject areas in our department.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: peer-led interventions; student engagement; transition; staff-student partnerships; student learning experience; higher education; students; education; building components; universities
Index terms: higher education, reflection, built environment, building component, mentoring, learning experience, graduate student, program, student engagement, staff-student partnership, survey, peer-led intervention, Birmingham
Subjects: communities and social development, curriculum design, professional development, architectural elements, Geography, learning methods, software systems, educational institutions, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, training, student development, student experience
Topics: Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Human Resources, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Education, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here