Pishdad-Bozorgi, P (2017) Case studies on the role of integrated project delivery approach on the establishment and promotion of trust. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 13(2), pp. 102-23. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
This article uses case studies to explore the IPD contractual approach from the standpoint of trust. It comprises two case studies of comparable IPD healthcare projects: Project A utilizes a single multi-party contract and lean construction; while Project B is transitional IPD-like by nature, incorporating a joining IPD agreement in addition to several two-party contracts. On Project B, team players are co-located and benefit from having past business relationships with one another. Project A, however, lacks these two attributes. These case studies identified attributes that establish and promote trust in IPD projects. These findings validate a theoretical IPD-Trust schema already established in the current published research; furthermore, the findings introduce seven new trust-building attributes leveraged by IPD. Additionally, the study compared trust across the two projects, and found that having pre-existing trust resulting from past business relationships, forming the best team, and co-locating project parties could be even more effective in creating trust than having a single multi-party contract with lean implementation without these attributes. This research also found that a single multi-party contract is more effective at building trust than multiple two-party contracts, since the latter pose the risk of inconsistently defined roles and responsibilities, and variable risk allocation across different agreements.; This article uses case studies to explore the IPD contractual approach from the standpoint of trust. It comprises two case studies of comparable IPD healthcare projects: Project A utilizes a single multi-party contract and lean construction; while Project B is transitional IPD-like by nature, incorporating a joining IPD agreement in addition to several two-party contracts. On Project B, team players are co-located and benefit from having past business relationships with one another. Project A, however, lacks these two attributes. These case studies identified attributes that establish and promote trust in IPD projects. These findings validate a theoretical IPD-Trust schema already established in the current published research; furthermore, the findings introduce seven new trust-building attributes leveraged by IPD. Additionally, the study compared trust across the two projects, and found that having pre-existing trust resulting from past business relationships, forming the best team, and co-locating project parties could be even more effective in creating trust than having a single multi-party contract with lean implementation without these attributes. This research also found that a single multi-party contract is more effective at building trust than multiple two-party contracts, since the latter pose the risk of inconsistently defined roles and responsibilities, and variable risk allocation across different agreements.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | trust development; co-location; integrated project delivery; trust establishment; relational contracting; case study |
| Index terms: | trust-building, integrated project delivery, project party, trust development, lean construction, trust establishment, implementation, agreements, co-location, risk allocation, relational contracting, promotion, case study, business relationship |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, strategic management, operations management, contract formation, psychology, contractual arrangements, management, financial risk, building construction, sociology |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Human Resources, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here