Unpacking cohort social ties: The appropriateness of perceived social capital to graduate early career performance in construction project teams

Thomson, D S; Carter, K and Grant, F (2017) Unpacking cohort social ties: The appropriateness of perceived social capital to graduate early career performance in construction project teams. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 13(4), pp. 299-316. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Construction project teams require social capital. When present in appropriate forms, it creates the social cohesion through which individuals accept project goals as their own. It lets team members share knowledge when present and reveal when it is missing. In education, social learning helps students appreciate the need for social capital appropriate to team performance. In practice, social capital enables the project team learning that overcomes project-specific challenges. Despite this importance, little is known about how students perceive social capital or the compatibility of that understanding with construction project needs. To characterise this aspect of 'graduateness,' collective understanding of social capital was elicited from construction students in a Scottish university by free recall. Analysis was structured around four dimensions of social capital: cohesion, legitimacy & authenticity, sharing, and safety. Notions of friendship were found to dominate student understanding of their social capital even though this understanding derived from settings where the need for capital to support team performance is emphasized. The potential for misalignment between the capital that graduating students bring into practice with that required by project teams was apparent. The case for further investigation of this influence on early career development was established.;Construction project teams require social capital. When present in appropriate forms, it creates the social cohesion through which individuals accept project goals as their own. It lets team members share knowledge when present and reveal when it is missing. In education, social learning helps students appreciate the need for social capital appropriate to team performance. In practice, social capital enables the project team learning that overcomes project-specific challenges. Despite this importance, little is known about how students perceive social capital or the compatibility of that understanding with construction project needs. To characterise this aspect of 'graduateness,' collective understanding of social capital was elicited from construction students in a Scottish university by free recall. Analysis was structured around four dimensions of social capital: cohesion, legitimacy & authenticity, sharing, and safety. Notions of friendship were found to dominate student understanding of their social capital even though this understanding derived from settings where the need for capital to support team performance is emphasized. The potential for misalignment between the capital that graduating students bring into practice with that required by project teams was apparent. The case for further investigation of this influence on early career development was established.;

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: social learning; social capital; team performance; social ties; social cohesion; interpersonal relationships; cohesion; construction; students; misalignment; project management; teams; professional development; universities
Index terms: project team, dimension, misalignment, cohesion, social ties, legitimacy, construction project team, investigation, social capital, interpersonal relationship, professional development, graduating student, social cohesion, construction project, career, team performance, project management, social learning
Subjects: sociology, professional development, theoretical framing, management, engineering problems, production management, behavioral psychology, data collection methods, student development, project management theory and practice, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, structural engineering
Topics: Education, Health and Safety, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here