Tucker, M; Mulliner, E and Wilson, H (2017) Research preparedness in the undergraduate property and construction curriculum: The student experience. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 13(3), pp. 203-24. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
This study investigates the student experience of undergraduate research in order to develop a "research preparedness framework" that can be applied to the development of undergraduate curriculum design within a case study organization. This research utilises built environment students from a Higher Education Institution in the U.K. The study adopts a multi-method qualitative design using focus groups with various student cohorts, including Building Surveying, Real Estate Management and Quantity Surveying, followed by face-to-face interviews with industry representatives. This study highlights a discrepancy between student's research preparedness and their understanding of its importance and perceived impact. It establishes areas for improvement within the curriculum to enhance students' research preparedness throughout their undergraduate career. There are numerous benefits for students from being involved in research, such as developing a critical mind-set through the appraisal, collection, analysis and interpretation of complex information. However, students often do not see the tangible benefit of developing research skills to help them succeed and differentiate once they make their transition from higher education to employment. This study provides intriguing findings for anyone involved in property and construction curriculum across the globe, and will also appeal to any institution where students are undertaking research activities/projects.;This study investigates the student experience of undergraduate research in order to develop a "research preparedness framework" that can be applied to the development of undergraduate curriculum design within a case study organization. This research utilises built environment students from a Higher Education Institution in the U.K. The study adopts a multi-method qualitative design using focus groups with various student cohorts, including Building Surveying, Real Estate Management and Quantity Surveying, followed by face-to-face interviews with industry representatives. This study highlights a discrepancy between student's research preparedness and their understanding of its importance and perceived impact. It establishes areas for improvement within the curriculum to enhance students' research preparedness throughout their undergraduate career. There are numerous benefits for students from being involved in research, such as developing a critical mind-set through the appraisal, collection, analysis and interpretation of complex information. However, students often do not see the tangible benefit of developing research skills to help them succeed and differentiate once they make their transition from higher education to employment. This study provides intriguing findings for anyone involved in property and construction curriculum across the globe, and will also appeal to any institution where students are undertaking research activities/projects.;
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | property and construction education; curriculum development; research preparedness; building surveying; studies; higher education; students; education; quantity surveying; curricula; college students; surveying; real estate |
| Index terms: | appraisal, higher education, focus group, curriculum development, career, real estate, undergraduate, building surveying, higher education institution, research preparedness, surveying, case study, interview, construction education, student experience, face, college student, employment, built environment |
| Subjects: | educational institutions, factor and component analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, management, real estate economics, professional development, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, student development, curriculum development, professional education, sociology, emergency and crisis management |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Human Resources, Information Management, Education, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here