Use of focus groups and reflexive thematic analysis to uncover the essential conditions for UK built environment degree apprenticeships

Dawson, S; Goulding, J and Gledson, B (2024) Use of focus groups and reflexive thematic analysis to uncover the essential conditions for UK built environment degree apprenticeships. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(4), pp. 562-580. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Degree Apprenticeships within UK Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) organizations present a raft of unprecedented opportunities. However, little is understood on precisely how AEC Employer Organizations (EO’s) truly engage with Higher Education Institutions (HEI’s) in order to create “meaningful” Built Environment Degree Apprenticeships. Understanding this challenge and minutia of this engagement forms the starting trajectory of this work. To do this, and informed by Boundary Object Theory, an interpretivist approach was used to capture qualitative data from transdisciplinary focus groups–representing domain experts from AEC/HEI sector bodies. Primary data was evaluated using reflexive thematic analysis. An integrated inductive/deductive approach was used to examine nuance, subjectivity, understanding and meaning. Research findings culminate in the form of a thematic map, highlighting four essential conditions to support the delivery of UK AEC DA’s; specifically, the need for: (i) Onboarding, (ii) Structure (iii) Cooperation, and, (iv) Infrastructure. These findings identified that the knowledge needed to support engagement goes beyond existing acknowledged boundaries–ergo, that the corollary impact of these essential conditions require much deeper understanding than first thought. These findings form part of a wider study, the results of which will be reported in later works.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: degree apprenticeships; education; focus groups; industry engagement; reflexive thematic analysis; skills; collaboration
Index terms: built environment, higher education institution, cooperation, boundaries, apprenticeship, collaboration, thematic analysis, subjectivity, meaning, boundary object, focus group
Subjects: professional education, educational institutions, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, collaborative management, management, methods and analysis, psychology, property law, data collection methods, human factors and perception
Topics: Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Education, Organizational Design, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here