Developing an assessment framework for evaluating knowledge-based safety culture in construction organizations

Deepak, M D and Mahesh, G (2024) Developing an assessment framework for evaluating knowledge-based safety culture in construction organizations. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(2), pp. 177-196. ISSN 15578771

Abstract

Many studies on safety in construction projects have indicated that positive safety culture in the workplace environment would reduce accidents. The inherent project-based characteristic of construction organizations means knowledge and experience are generally lost when a project is completed. This transitory nature hinders an organization’s attempt to develop and maintain a knowledge-based positive safety culture. Also, this can be overcome by continuous monitoring and reviewing of the knowledge-based safety culture required to enforce safety standards and regulations required for construction organizations. In order to achieve this, a quantitative assessment framework for knowledge-based safety culture is a prerequisite. Therefore, this study aims to develop a measurable quantitative framework based on the importance of factors pertaining to psychological, behavioral, organizational, and knowledge dimensions of knowledge-based safety culture. A survey questionnaire is employed to examine the importance of these factors. The survey findings are used to formulate a framework suitable for use in the construction industry. Furthermore, this framework is validated by considering case scenarios among safety-certified and non-certified construction organizations. The proposed analytical framework can be used for assessing the knowledge-based safety culture scores of construction organizations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: assessment framework; construction organization; knowledge-based safety culture; safety-knowledge; questionaire survey
Index terms: survey, workplace environment, construction project, questionnaire, regulation, analytical framework, safety standards, safety culture, construction organization, monitoring, dimension, construction industry
Subjects: sociology, occupational health and safety management, political science, industry analysis, production management, health safety and environment, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, organization, data collection methods, control systems
Topics: Governance, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here