Effects of welfare facilities (amenities for well-being) on the satisfaction of civil engineers in construction industry

Irfan, M; Jalil, A; Khan, M and Khan, S (2024) Effects of welfare facilities (amenities for well-being) on the satisfaction of civil engineers in construction industry. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(2), pp. 197-217. ISSN 15578771

Abstract

The construction industry plays an important role in the upliftment of a country’s economy. Thus, the satisfaction of workers in the construction industry is of prime importance, since it is believed that satisfied working staff will be more efficient and effective. Therefore, it becomes crucial to understand the factors that may influence the satisfaction of the workforce. Among these factors, recently, welfare facilities have received much attention. In this study, welfare facilities such as health, hygiene, eating, drinking, resting, safety, and transportation play a vital role in the satisfaction of workers in the construction industry. Furthermore, a questionnaire survey was used to collect data from 203 civil engineers in Balochistan, Pakistan. The data was analyzed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Consequently, the empirical findings indicated that providing welfare facilities have a significant positive impact on the satisfaction of workers. Additionally, the results indicate that among the facilities, transportation and hygiene facilities are the major requirements of civil engineers. Hence, it can be concluded from the findings that organizations that are involved in construction projects, wish to increase the satisfaction of workers and success rate, they should focus on providing welfare facilities to their employees.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: partial least squares-structural equation modeling; satisfaction; welfare facilities; questionaire survey
Index terms: structural equation modelling, survey, civil engineer, well-being, Pakistan, construction project, questionnaire, partial least square, satisfaction, construction industry
Subjects: project delivery, mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, profession, statistical analysis, industry analysis, production management, Geography
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here