Leathem, T and Burt, R (2024) Leveraging qualitative analysis software to complement traditional qualitative research approaches for curriculum design: Results of a needs assessment study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(4), pp. 544-561. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Educational programs are continually challenged with maintaining a curriculum that meets the current and future needs of the industry they serve, and accreditation requirements. Research methodologies of interviews, focus groups, and surveys to accomplish these requirements have a long-standing documented history in the literature. Interviews and focus groups can provide collection of rich information, but have limited sample size, and greater potential for participant and researcher bias. Survey research can be more objective and reach larger population, but results are limited to the type and quality of questions posed by the researchers, and honesty of the participant responses. Technological advances in data collection and analysis have been improving research methodologies for decades. This paper describes a research approach for conducting a program needs assessment. Using structured focus groups and qualitative artificial intelligence software, MAXQDA, the methodology identified 15 themes for activities commonly performed by entry-level construction management graduates. Within the themes, 17 common types of knowledge, and 15 types of skills were identified. Key knowledge included Terms & Symbols, Project Documents, Materials & Methods, Software Platforms, Scopes of Work, and Contract Structures. The top skills identified were Oral & Written Communication, Using/Learning Software/Technology, Collaboration/Teamwork, Analyzing/Interpreting Documents, and Personal Organization/Time Management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; entry-level jobs; needs assessment; qualitative software |
| Index terms: | focus group, interview, survey, documents, qualitative analysis, bias, methodology, qualitative research, collaboration, population, program, history, teamwork, platform, time management, contract structure, sample size, research methodology, artificial intelligence |
| Subjects: | project controls, demography, management, research methods, software systems, digital design, professional development, probability and distributions, contractual arrangements, artificial intelligence, architectural and construction history, data collection methods, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Time Control, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Procurement, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here