Soni, M S M and Smallwood, J J (2024) Perceptions of corruption in the South African construction industry. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(1), pp. 43-64. ISSN 15578771
Abstract
Corruption continues to overshadow the fundamental contributions of the construction industry, preventing the delivery of infrastructure services. Therefore, the aim of the study was to investigate perceptions of corruption within the South African construction industry. The study population consisted of practitioners and clients in the private and public sectors operating in Johannesburg, South Africa, across seven councils and associations. Participants completed a self-administered survey consisting of 49 questions focusing on 10 key areas assessing corruption in construction. There were a total of 270 survey respondents. There was consensus among participants that bribery exists in the South African construction industry and that bribery discourages whistleblowing. A majority of respondents agreed that corruption affects economic growth of the South African construction industry. Respondents felt corruption led to late completion of projects, poor workmanship, and led to the use of sub-standard materials. Respondents agreed that poor procurement processes resulted in the appointment of incompetent contractors and that practitioners engage in unethical behavior due to desperation for work. Findings support, corruption is a major issue in the South African construction industry and approaches are needed to eradicate the corruption.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | corruption; South Africa; questionaire survey; questionaire survey |
| Index terms: | practitioner, corruption, population, workmanship, South Africa, procurement process, survey, economic growth, construction industry, Johannesburg, public sector |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, Geography, contractual condition, economic development, administrative law, professional ethics, industry analysis, demography |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Contract Administration, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here