Wang, X; Hasanzadeh, S; Short, K M; Fiori, C M and Sands, K S (2024) A pedagogical framework for enhancing the entrepreneurial leadership mindsets of construction students: A pilot study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(4), pp. 464-482. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Researchers and academics have recognized and reported the need for entrepreneurship education in the past two decades. However, limited attention has been paid to developing entrepreneurial leadership mind-sets in construction education. This study proposes and makes a case for a pedagogical framework to prepare students to be leaders driven to create successful businesses within the construction sectors. The framework considers the characteristic attributes of entrepreneurial vision, which could be reflected by various efforts that foster curiosity, make connections, and create value for others. Under the guide of this vision and considering the role of technology adoption in entrepreneurship, the pedagogical framework is building on the experiential learning theory, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), and the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework. The pedagogical framework was incorporated and examined as a term project in a construction course. After completing the project, an established instrument was applied to assess students’ entrepreneurial leadership mind-sets, and the overall positive results showed the effectiveness of the proposed pedagogical framework. This study aims to provide a framework for construction educators as a meta-curriculum to enhance the students’ entrepreneurial leadership mind-sets.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | entrepreneurial leadership mind-sets; experiential learning; technology adoption |
| Index terms: | technology adoption, entrepreneurship, effectiveness, construction sector, construction education, mindset, experiential learning |
| Subjects: | performance management, professional education, industry analysis, business, health behaviours and lifestyles, learning methods, innovation and technology management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here