Using grounded theory analysis in construction management and civil engineering education: Integrating perspectives to shape a comprehensive view of sustainability

Wang, X; South, A and Farnsworth, C (2024) Using grounded theory analysis in construction management and civil engineering education: Integrating perspectives to shape a comprehensive view of sustainability. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 20(4), pp. 501-522. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Sustainability education becomes a crucial approach to help next generation construction managers and civil engineers to address the need to reconcile between the rapid resource depletion and economic development in the built environment. As educators strive to prepare future professionals for the evolving demands of sustainability in the construction industry, a better understanding of the current landscape of sustainability education in higher education becomes necessary. This entails recognizing the diverse perceptions and interpretations held by construction management and civil engineering (CM/CE) faculty regarding the essential elements of sustainability, as they influence students’ understanding and are also carried forward into students’ future professional careers. The authors used a qualitative research approach to characterize the concept of sustainability in its rudimentary form. We collected individual faculty members’ definitions of sustainability by conducting semi-structured interviews. Subsequently, grounded theory analysis (GTA) was used to analyze interview transcripts, aiming to unveil patterns and trends that then form a theory-like conclusion. Through this inductive qualitative approach, the authors developed the CM/CE Sustainability Definition Framework (SDF), comprising durability, resource efficiency, meeting societal needs, and minimizing environmental impacts. This paper demonstrates how GTA can be used as an effective qualitative research methodology for CM/CE education research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: civil engineering education; construction management education; grounded theory analysis; qualitative research; sustainability
Index terms: engineering education, higher education, durability, qualitative approach, grounded theory, construction industry, built environment, depletion, resource efficiency, civil engineer, construction management education, sustainability education, interview, economic development, construction manager, environmental impact, career, methodology, qualitative research
Subjects: environmental resource management, material degradation and durability, profession, data collection methods, research design and methodology, environmental impact, educational institutions, professional education, educational innovation, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, economic development, management, theoretical framing, research methods, professional development
Topics: Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Education
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here