Aiyin, J and Yimin, Z (2010) A multi-stage approach to time-cost trade-off analysis using mathematical programming. International Journal of Construction Management, 10(3), pp. 13-27. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Time-cost trade-offs are a critical construction planning issue, which have received significant amount of research. Many existing solutions are based on evolutionary algorithms, which are search-based and ignore the structure of time-cost trade-off problems. Mathematical programming methods were applied previously but their computational limitations have been widely recognized. This study proposed a multistage approach based on linear programming and integer programming to improve the efficiency of time-cost trade-off analysis using mathematical programming. Three models are used in this approach-a normal duration model, a reduction time model, and an adjustment model. The normal duration model finds the normal project duration. The reduction time model seeks optimum solutions to minimize the total cost subject to a project deadline by assuming all crash-able activities are linear-continuous (LC). The adjustment model finds feasible solution for non-linear-continuous (NLC) activities whose reduction time given by the reduction model is not reasonable. It is a pure binary programming model. Using this approach, the reduction time model narrows down the number of NLC activities that need reduction time adjustment. This step improves the adjustment model computational efficiency. A case study issued to demonstrate the application and the potential of this approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction planning; critical path method; integer programming; linear programming; time-cost trade-off |
| Index terms: | case study, efficiency, evolutionary algorithm, linear programming, time-cost trade-off, integer programming, construction planning, duration, programming, mathematical programming, critical path method |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, programming, operations research, construction planning, algorithms, performance management, quantity surveying, project controls |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Time Control, Site Management, Research Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here