Jin, X H and Zuo, J (2011) Critical uncertainty factors for efficient risk allocation in privately financed public infrastructure projects in Australia. International Journal of Construction Management, 11(3), pp. 19-34. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Risk allocation in privately financed public infrastructure projects, commonly referred to as public-private partnership (PPP) projects, is a challenging job due to the nature of incomplete contracting. Choosing a risk allocation strategy could be viewed as the process of deciding the proportion of risk management attributable to the public and private partners based on a series of characteristics of the risk management service transaction in question. These characteristics can be related to the various uncertainty factors. In this study, uncertainty factors have been grouped into Institutional, Social and industrial, Economic, and Project-specific categories and examined in order to achieve efficient risk allocation and minimize risk management-related costs in a long-term view. Critical uncertainty factors for the allocation of three major risks have been identified through an industry-wide survey in Australia. These identified critical uncertainty factors are expected to help decision-makers from both public and private sectors choose efficient allocation strategies for major risks. Future research directions are also set out.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; public-private partnership; risk allocation; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | survey, strategy, Australia, partnership, private sector, public infrastructure, risk allocation, risk management |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, partnership management, financial risk, Geography, management, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here