Managing lean projects: Understanding the structures of lean production

Tan, W (2011) Managing lean projects: Understanding the structures of lean production. International Journal of Construction Management, 11(3), pp. 67-78. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to assess problems with lean production (LP) in the wake of recent worldwide recalls of millions of cars by automakers at the forefront of LP. The paper defines LP more broadly than the literature to include the structures of culture and political economy. It uses Toyota as a case study to identify the structural weaknesses of the entire lean production system beyond the shop floor. The main findings are, firstly, that the Toyota system is not well understood, and often misunderstood, with respect to its possible political-economic and social conditions of existence. This implies that the system cannot be easily replicated elsewhere. Secondly, changing structural conditions, particularly in the labor market and industrial system, have encouraged Toyota to introduce slower lines of production for older and female workers, use buffers to overcome more frequent production halts, and reduce the design cycle. Coupled with rising demand for its vehicles and the inevitable use of accelerated testing of complex systems, the recent spate of quality problems is not unexpected. These findings are of value to project managers who wish to obtain a deeper insight into the structural problems of LP and project management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: culture; lean production; lean project management; quality; structure
Index terms: complex system, project manager, case study, testing, project management, political economy, labour market, buffer, lean production
Subjects: financial risk, project management theory and practice, manufacturing engineering, economics, systems engineering, economic and policy analysis, data collection methods, profession, professional practice
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here