English, J and Bowen, P (2012) Overcoming potential risks to females employed in the South African construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 12(1), pp. 37-49. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Legislation in South Africa tasks the construction industry to increase employment of women in traditionally male workplaces. Susceptibility of women to negative factors (some contributing to HIV and AIDS) and the counter-active measures open to industry are explored. Empirical data were gathered via questionnaires and interviews to gain perceptions of employers and site-based employees. Findings comprise: sexual harassment; critical mass [numbers]; male chauvinism and sexism; and personal on-site safety. Female employees are more positive than male about women working on-site and overcoming male chauvinism and sexual harassment. Critical mass of women on site is seen as a prerequisite for safety. Women, more than men, consider sites inadequate in meeting safety and personal hygiene requirements of women. These factors contribute to exposure of women to risk of HIV and AIDS. The findings showed involvement with community and scholars improves women's options in construction. Employees need to be more proactive in sensitizing male workers to the role of women in the industry and their potential contribution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | HIV; AIDS; personal risk; South Africa; women |
| Index terms: | option, construction industry, women, employment, exposure, South Africa, questionnaire, interview, legislation |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, sociology, decision analysis, Geography, management, public and environmental health, legal systems, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Human Resources, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here