Jaafar, M and Othman, N L (2013) Assessing the capability of women construction project managers based on liberal feminist theory. International Journal of Construction Management, 13(4), pp. 35-52. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Studies on the involvement and capability of women in the construction industry are rare in developing countries. Although a minority in the industry, women construction project managers have the same level of importance as men. In a construction organization, the position of a project manager is the most challenging task. This study aims to explore the capabilities of women construction project managers in the Malaysian construction industry in comparison with their male counterparts. Liberal feminist theory is applied as an underpinning theory to explain the concept of "equal capability of women." This study adopts the mixed methods approach. It covers Grade 7 construction companies listed in the Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) directory in Peninsular Malaysia. From a sample of 48 companies known to have women project managers, only 15 responses were received. Based on the responses, only five agreed to be interviewed. Descriptive analysis reveals that the employment of female project managers is based on merit, which is closely associated (in ranking) with their experience, skills, personal attributes, and level of education. Moreover, male and female project managers in the construction industry are assumed to possess equal capability. This study contributes to the extension of knowledge on the equal employment opportunity practiced in construction companies in Malaysia.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competency; equal capability; merit; women project manager |
| Index terms: | women, minority, construction industry, mixed method, project manager, Malaysia, construction organization, construction industry development, employment, construction project, developing country, manager, construction company |
| Subjects: | organization, profession, data collection methods, practitioner, management, development economics, Geography, production management, sociology, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Ethics, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here