Othman, A A E (2013) Investigating the competency of property development graduates towards satisfying the requirements of the construction industry in South Africa: The case of the University of KwaZulu-Natal. International Journal of Construction Management, 13(4), pp. 75-102. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Property Development graduates play a significant role in sustaining the economic growth of South Africa. Hence, they have to be adequately equipped with state-of-the-art knowledge and skills to satisfy the need of the South African construction industry. The unique structure of the construction industry coupled with the challenges of global competitiveness and changing regulatory requirements calls for highly educated and competent graduates. However, it seems that there is a lack of direction and leadership concerning Property Development education in South Africa. This view is supported by construction professionals who stated that Property Development graduates are not provided with the appropriate combination of hard and soft skills needed to deal with complex construction projects. Accordingly, this paper investigates the competency requirements of Property Development graduates, especially with a major in Construction Management, as an approach to satisfy the qualifications of the South African construction industry. The Property Development Programme at the University of KwaZulu-Natal is examined after achieving the lowest rate in a survey conducted to study the appropriateness of built environment tertiary education in South Africa. To achieve this aim, a research methodology consisting of literature review and survey questionnaires, is designed to accomplish three objectives. Firstly, literature review is used to investigate the structure of the Property Development Programme at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, National Qualifications Framework and Construction Management education. Secondly, survey questionnaires were used to investigate the relevancy of the Property Development Programme at the University of KwaZulu-Natal towards meeting the National Qualifications Framework unit standards and the South African construction industry requirements. Finally, this research summarises the conclusions and recommendations useful for improving Property Development and Construction Management education in South Africa. Although the research revealed that the Property Development Programme succeeded in graduating students who are adequately equipped to satisfy the expectations of the the South African construction industry, a number of key areas have been highlighted to enhance the Property Development and Construction Management education in South Africa generally and at the University of KwaZulu-Natal in particular.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competency requirement; construction management education; national qualifications framework; property development programme; South Africa |
| Index terms: | qualification, graduating student, construction professional, research methodology, built environment, competitiveness, property development, economic growth, construction industry, tertiary, literature review, construction management education, programme, survey, construction project, questionnaire, state of the art, South Africa |
| Subjects: | curriculum development, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, data collection methods, research dissemination and communication, professional education, project controls, market analysis, student development, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, educational resources, economic development, professional development, production management, Geography |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Time Control, Education, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Information Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here