Critical review of approaches to integrating virtual models and the physical construction

Akanmu, A; Anumba, C and Messner, J (2014) Critical review of approaches to integrating virtual models and the physical construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(4), pp. 267-282. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Virtual models have proven to be highly beneficial and of great significance to the building and construction industry. However, the full potential of virtual models, especially at the construction and operation phases, remains largely unrealized. With the developments in information and communication technology, a number of attempts have been made to extend the use of these models, through the development of integration approaches and technologies. An important aspect of integration not adequately addressed so far relates to that between the virtual model and physical construction such as to enable bi-directional coordination. Bi-directional coordination between virtual models and the physical construction has the potential to improve consistency maintenance, real-time progress monitoring and control of construction process/constructed facility, tracking of changes and model updates, information exchange between the design office and the real-time, documentation of as-built status, and sustainable practices. This paper presents a comprehensive and critical review of literature on the various integration approaches and technologies in AEC/FM. This paper provides value by identifying the key facets of an effective integration between virtual models and the physical construction. The paper outlines the limitations of existing systems in addressing these key facets, and discusses the opportunities for improvement by introducing the role of cyber-physical systems approach.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bi-directional coordination; cyber-physical systems; physical construction; virtual models
Index terms: information exchange, documentation, information and communication technology, progress monitoring, integration, construction process, operation phase, sustainable practice, construction industry, coordination
Subjects: professional development, management, industry analysis, organizational analysis, project controls, building construction, sustainable practices, computing systems, data science, project delivery
Topics: Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here