Banawi, A and Bilec, M M (2014) A framework to improve construction processes: Integrating lean, green and six sigma. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(1), pp. 45-55. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The construction industry consumes a significant amount of resources annually, generates significant waste and produces a host of emissions. This study develops a framework and integrates three different approaches - Lean, Green and Six Sigma - in a systematic approach with the goal of improving the quality and environmental impacts of the construction process. A case study of pile cap installation was conducted to illustrate the application of the framework and associated results. The study highlights two issues within the pile cap construction process responsible for waste: delay and potential errors in material estimation and ordering. It describes the environmental impact arising from waste, and analyzes the root causes behind waste generation to enable improved process performance. A survey of construction professionals regarding the causal factors of waste in everyday construction activities identified 'design changes during construction' as responsible for 60% of waste occurrences during construction and thus confirm results from the literature. In conclusion, the Lean- Green-Six Sigma framework offers a comprehensive, multi-stage approach for process improvement and minimization of life cycle environmental impacts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction processes improvement; greening construction processes; life cycle assessment; six sigma; value stream mapping |
| Index terms: | construction professional, construction industry, case study, waste generation, life cycle, construction activity, estimation, value stream mapping, construction process, environmental impact, process performance, process improvement, six sigma, minimization, greening, design change, life cycle assessment, survey |
| Subjects: | business, data collection methods, value management, environmental impact, financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, construction operations, algorithms, performance measurement, management, professional development, sustainable design, building construction, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here