Criteria for strategic decision-making at the pre-briefing stage

Smith, J and Wyatt, R (1998) Criteria for strategic decision-making at the pre-briefing stage. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.

Abstract

The client briefing stage is heavily researched throughout the world. The pre-briefing, or strategic stage, which precedes it, is the focus of this research. This is where the nature of the project is defined because a choice has to be made between alternative strategies. Ten criteria have been established as the means of evaluating such strategies and the criteria compared to those emerging from the design, procurement and project management literature. Criteria from the urban planning literature have been incorporated into one of the author’s neural network-based software for addressing urban planning and other problems; titled, Strategizer. The original Strategizer was then modified in order to manage client problems. This new version is called Stratbuild and it has used our ten criteria for several simulated and real client briefing problems. The criteria are described and compared with those used by researchers in the procurement and client briefing literature. Alternative solutions (some not concerned with a building solution) have been evaluated using these criteria. Implications for the design team in focussing on the strategic stages are discussed.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: clients; project objectives; strategic management; neural networks
Index terms: urban planning, decision-making, design team, briefing, strategic management, neural network, project management, strategy
Subjects: urban planning, artificial intelligence, project management theory and practice, professional practice, management, scope management, decision analysis
Topics: Design Practice, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Project Management, Governance
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here