Chileshe, N and John Kikwasi, G (2014) Risk assessment and management practices (ramp) within the Tanzania construction industry: Implementation barriers and advocated solutions. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(4), pp. 239-254. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Despite the extensive research on the barriers to the implementation of risk assessment and management practices (RAMP); there is a paucity of studies that examine these barriers within the context of developing countries, particularly Africa. This paper aims to investigate the perceptions of Tanzanian construction professionals concerning the barriers to the implementation of RAMP. A triangulated data collection approach is adopted. Barriers identified from literature review were empirically tested by data collected using a sample survey of 67 construction professionals drawn from 27 consultants; 24 contractors and 16 client organizations within the Tanzanian construction industry (TCI). Response data was subjected to descriptive and inferential statistics. Ranking and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine the barriers affecting the implementation of RAMP. These three listed barriers were identified as significant: (i) awareness of risk management processes; (ii) lack of experience; and (iii) lack of information. In contrast, 'cost implementations' and 'time constraints' were ranked lowly. The identified barriers could be used as a 'road map' for the development of appropriate solutions for successful implementation of RAMP, and to improve the decision-making processes of construction organizations. In addition, knowledge and understanding of risk management process would effectively contribute to identifying and managing inherent risk.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barriers; questionnaire survey; risk assessment; risk management; Tanzania |
| Index terms: | statistics, implementation, construction industry, risk assessment, construction professional, risk management, decision-making process, variance, construction organization, Tanzania, Africa, management practice, questionnaire, literature review, survey, client organization, developing country |
| Subjects: | regions and continents, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, organization, client relations, mathematical modelling, risk assessment, data collection methods, industry analysis, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, financial risk, development economics, professional development, Geography, management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here