Ey, W; Zuo, J and Han, S (2014) Barriers and challenges of collaborative procurements: An exploratory study. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(3), pp. 148-155. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The construction industry has been notorious for its poor performance and confrontational disputes. This is arguably attributed to the competitive nature of the traditional design-bid-build procurement approach where various stakeholders have different perspectives. Interest has been growing in the adoption of collaborative procurement approach where all participating parties are encouraged to cooperate and collaborate towards efficient project delivery. Although numerous studies have been conducted on collaborative procurement, most of them primarily focused on the positive side of collaborative procurement without due consideration of the barriers and challenges for its successful application. To address this lack, this paper aims to present a comprehensive understanding of collaborative procurement. Specifically, the paper investigates current practices of collaborative procurement in Australia, particularly focusing on the barriers and challenges. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 industry professionals and the interview results identified commercial-related barriers (e.g., facilitating market entry of competitors, loss of control, protection of intellectual property, complexity of framework, systems and practices, and loss of identity) as well as human-related barriers (e.g., trust, understating or commitment). The likelihood of successful implementation of collaborative procurements will be enhanced if these challenges and barriers are taken into consideration from a very early stage of the project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barriers; challenges; collaborative procurement; practitioners' view; semi-structured interview |
| Index terms: | implementation, market entry, construction industry, project delivery, identity, dispute, Australia, design-bid-build, complexity, practitioner, intellectual property, commitment, face, exploratory study, interview |
| Subjects: | intellectual property, practitioner, dispute resolution, data collection methods, business, contractual arrangements, project delivery, psychology, Geography, research methods, industry analysis, systems engineering, sociology |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here