Kaboli, A S and Carmichael, D G (2014) Optimum scraper load time and fleet size for minimum emissions. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(4), pp. 209-226. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Scrapers are commonly used in road construction, site formation, other earthmoving and surface mining operations. It is known that loading a scraper to capacity may not be best in terms of unit operational cost, because the load-growth curve for a scraper is nonlinear - the loading rate decreases with load time. However, there is no published research considering the effect of load time and fleet size on unit emissions, and what the corresponding optimal load time and fleet size might be. This paper shows that the optimum scraper load time for unit emissions may be the same or slightly less than that for unit cost depending on the scraper type and operation, while the optimum fleet size in terms of minimum unit emissions, is slightly higher than or the same as that in terms of minimum unit cost. Cost-load-time, emissions-load-time and hauling characteristics, particular for different equipment and operations, influence the conclusion. For practice purposes, it could be said that the optimal unit cost and unit emissions solutions essentially coincide. Case study site data, in conjunction with a scraper operational analysis, are used to demonstrate the optima. Both push-pull scrapers and push-loaded scrapers are considered.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost; earthmoving; emissions; optimal fleet size; optimal load time; production; scrapers |
| Index terms: | unit emission, unit cost, case study, road construction, mining, earthmoving, loading |
| Subjects: | civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, environmental impact, data collection methods, construction operations, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here