Smith, S (1998) Stochastic analysis of cyclic construction processes. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.
Abstract
Many construction processes are stochastic systems. A deterministic analysis of these systems may not allow for the random distribution of system events, resulting in poor or unrealistic system attributes. Two examples of such systems are the cyclic processes of earthmoving and concrete placing. While both processes have different objectives, their execution has much in common; in particular both can be modelled as queuing systems. Analysis of such models allows the construction engineer to firstly achieve improved estimates of the overall productivity and thus schedule operations better, and secondly, determine the effect of non-anticipated events such as excessive delivery or cycle times. Outlined are results obtained from studies of both earthmoving and concreting operations; both studies are based on data obtained from actual UK construction projects. Results have been encouraging and have been used by a major UK civil engineering contractor in the management of earthmoving operations. Preliminary results have indicated initially that a numerical model of earthmoving and concreting operations can be analysed using simulation techniques. Secondly, it has been shown that the estimation of construction operations using such techniques can be more accurate and realistic than when more traditional or deterministic methods are used.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concreting; earthmoving; estimating; planning; stochastic systems |
| Index terms: | earthmoving, estimate, engineering contractor, estimating, stochastic analysis, construction process, construction project, placing, concreting, engineer, numerical model, productivity, construction operation, estimation |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, construction operations, modelling and simulation, mathematical modelling, profession, building construction, production management, firms, management, concrete and cementitious materials |
| Topics: | Site Management, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here