Bong, S; Rameezdeen, R; Zuo, J; Li, R Y M and Ye, G (2015) The designer's role in workplace health and safety in the construction industry: Post-harmonized regulations in South Australia. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(4), pp. 276-287. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The federal government of Australia harmonized the Workplace Health and Safety (WHS) legislation from each jurisdiction in 2013. Nevertheless, little is known about its acceptance in the construction community. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify the views of industry stakeholders on safety design in the harmonized safety regulations of South Australia. A desk study on pre-and post-harmonized WHS regulations reveals that design for safety now constitutes a major theme in practice following the harmonization process. After that, a questionnaire survey is conducted to investigate the use of design for safety in the construction industry. The results show that the guidelines promote safety-related design requirements without significantly increasing designers' and contractors' workload. Designers are aware of the hazards on sites and design firms are willing to embrace the guidelines if they are protected from liability. However, the extent to which contracting and procurement systems encourage safety design is uncertain. Moreover, the problem of cost hinders designers in implementing it unless the client accepts it as part of the over-arching life cycle cost structure. There is great uncertainty on whether the concept will be promoted through regulation and subsequently lead to a reduction in hazardous risks and injury rates.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health; regulation; safety |
| Index terms: | design for safety, questionnaire, regulation, workload, jurisdiction, survey, life cycle cost, legislation, injury, liability, health and safety, construction industry, South Australia, procurement system, construction community, designer, Australia, design firm |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, liability law, political science, health conditions and diseases, health safety and environment, Geography, professional development, physical geography and landforms, management, research methods, contractual arrangements, legal systems, practitioner, data collection methods, profession |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Governance, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here