The optimal debt ratio of public-private partnership projects

Chen, B; Mao, C K and Hu, J L (2015) The optimal debt ratio of public-private partnership projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(3), pp. 239-253. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Many governments regard the public-private partnership (PPP) as the best approach to implement high speed rail projects. However, most PPP schemes incorporate long-term debts in the capital structure due to huge initial investments and long recovery periods. An optimal capital structure, meaning the financing mix between debt and equity, maximizes the value of the PPP project. The terms and conditions of the debt are subject to negotiations between the private sponsor and the financiers, given the concession agreement between the host government and the sponsor. Debt ratio is a key term in the project finance funding agreement. This study contributes to the project preparation of PPP schemes by developing a simple model to determine the optimal debt ratio for financing PPP projects and to establish the relationship between debt ratio and hurdle rates of projects' financial indices. Results suggest that the hurdle rate of financial net present value determines the lower limit of debt ratio and the hurdle rate of times interest earned decides the upper limit of debt ratio in the Taiwan high speed rail project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: debt ratio; optimal capital structure; project negotiations; public-private partnership projects
Index terms: recovery, net present value, negotiation, meaning, partnership, project finance, funding, high speed rail, financing, capital structure, Taiwan
Subjects: operations management, partnership management, conflict resolution, financial management, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, economic analysis, Geography
Topics: Cost Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here