Jarkas, A M (2015) Factors influencing labour productivity in Bahrain's construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(1), pp. 94-108. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
There are many challenges facing the construction industry in the Kingdom of Bahrain, but it can be reasonably argued that low labour productivity is among the most important. The primary objective of this investigation, therefore, is to identify, explore, and rank the relative importance of the critical factors influencing labour productivity in Bahrain's construction industry. To achieve this objective, a statistically representative sample of contractors was invited to participate in a structured questionnaire survey comprising 37 productivity factors, which were categorized under the following major groups: (i) management; (ii) technological; (iii) labour; and (iv) external. Using the relative importance index technique, the following factors are perceived as most significant in their influence on labour productivity: (1) labour skills; (2) coordination among design disciplines; (3) lack of labour supervision; (4) errors and omissions in design drawings; (5) delay in responding to requests for information; (6) rework; (7) stringent inspection by the engineer; (8) working overtime; (9) lack of incentive scheme; and (10) inclement weather. The results obtained fill a gap in knowledge of factors affecting labour productivity in the construction industry, which can be used by industry practitioners to develop a wider and deeper perspective of the factors impacting on the efficiency of operatives, and thus assist in achieving a reasonable level of competitiveness and a cost-effective operation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Kingdom of Bahrain; labour productivity |
| Index terms: | relative importance, rework, relative importance index, survey, questionnaire, practitioner, weather, efficiency, design drawing, engineer, productivity, critical factor, inspection, Bahrain, investigation, labour productivity, competitiveness, construction industry, coordination, supervision, operative |
| Subjects: | technical documentation, operations management, risk assessment, profession, data collection methods, air quality, control systems, practitioner, market analysis, industry analysis, quality assurance, management, performance management, Geography |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Site Management, Design Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here