Jarkas, A M; Al Balushi, R A and Raveendranath, P K (2015) Determinants of construction labour productivity in Oman. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(4), pp. 332-344. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Notwithstanding the technological developments, construction continues to be a labour-intensive industry, and hence labour productivity remains the industry's predominant determinant of performance. One of the primary challenges facing the construction industry in the Sultanate of Oman is low labour productivity. Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify, explore and rank the relative importance of the cardinal determinants of construction labour productivity in Oman. A statistically representative sample of contractors was thus invited to participate in a structured questionnaire survey comprising 33 productivity factors. Using the relative importance index technique, the findings distinguish the following factors as most significant: (1) errors and omission in design drawings; (2) changes to orders during execution; (3) delay in responding to requests for information; (4) lack of labour supervision; (5) clarity of project specifications; (6) coordination level amongst design disciplines; (7) working overtime; (8) rework; (9) inclement weather; and (10) physical fatigue. The outcomes not only fill a gap in knowledge of the critical determinants of labour productivity in the Sultanate, but may also be used by academics and industry practitioners to develop a deeper and wider perspective on the factors influencing the efficiency of the construction labour force.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | labour productivity; contractor; efficiency; operative; Sultanate of Oman |
| Index terms: | survey, relative importance index, fatigue, rework, specification, relative importance, weather, practitioner, questionnaire, Oman, productivity, design drawing, efficiency, operative, supervision, coordination, determinant, construction industry, labour productivity, construction labour |
| Subjects: | operations management, technical documentation, practitioner, control systems, air quality, data collection methods, risk assessment, industry analysis, health conditions and diseases, Geography, contractual condition, performance management, management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Quality Management, Site Management, Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here