Tutesigensi, A; Smith, N J and Moodley, K (1998) Key influences on project identification in building projects in Uganda. In: Hughes, W (ed.) Proceedings of 14th Annual ARCOM Conference, 9-11 September 1998, Reading, UK.
Abstract
The construction project is characterized by sequential phases, each of which contributes to the final attributes of the project. The efficient management of a construction project must therefore start with its first phase, the project identification phase. Effective management of the phase requires that the importance of factors associated with the inputs, interaction process and outputs, be known. These factors and their relative importance are environment specific. This paper introduces a methodology of identifying and arriving at consensus about the importance of key factors associated with inputs, interaction process and outputs of the project identification phase. The method involves initiating a search, and systematically extracting the data, from a carefully selected source. A Delphi technique procedure is then used to ensure convergence of opinion based on the participants' successive interaction with information from their environment. The paper demonstrates the employment of the methodology with a sample of one hundred building projects in Uganda. This specific example paves the way for the design of better and effective management procedures in a bid to optimize operation at organizational and industry level in Uganda. The paper identifies the influential factors during the project identification to allow for better decision-making.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project; project identification; consensus; Delphi technique |
| Index terms: | relative importance, employment, influential factor, decision-making, methodology, construction project, Delphi technique, interaction, Uganda |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, decision analysis, production management, Geography, research methods, management, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Risk Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here