Knowledge management in the construction industry: The strategy of Singapore

Tan, W (2015) Knowledge management in the construction industry: The strategy of Singapore. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(1), pp. 10-16. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

In the construction industry, knowledge management is usually associated with the management of organizational knowledge. Little is known in a systematic way about how knowledge is coherently managed at the industry level. This paper analyses the case of Singapore to illustrate how knowledge is managed at this level to correct for pervasive market failure in information generation and dissemination. It focuses on the policies and institutions that allow Singapore to continuously tap construction knowledge and achieve a high level of construction quality within a relatively short span of time.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: coordination failure; imperfect information; institutions; knowledge management; market failure
Index terms: coordination, construction industry, dissemination, construction quality, market failure, Singapore, strategy, knowledge management
Subjects: industry analysis, Geography, economic analysis, knowledge translation, management, quality assurance, professional development
Topics: Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Information Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here