Factors affecting construction labour productivity: A case study of Jordan

Hiyassat, M A; Hiyari, M A and Sweis, G J (2016) Factors affecting construction labour productivity: A case study of Jordan. International Journal of Construction Management, 16(2), pp. 138-149. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Improving productivity in construction is a way of increasing profit with little or no increase in cost. Labour productivity in construction in developing countries, including Jordan, is relatively low and needs to be improved significantly. The objective of this paper is to describe and analyse the factors that affect construction labour productivity. To achieve this goal, a questionnaire survey containing 27 questions (variables) was conducted. It was sent to 200 engineers and foremen who work for contractors. The 90 returned responses were statistically analysed by calculating the average, standard deviation, and RII of each variable. The results of a Spearman correlation‒rank‒coefficient test showed that no significant differences existed between the responses of the engineers and foremen. It was concluded that the top three ranked dimensions were 'Productivity increases as experience increases', 'Financial incentives increase productivity', and 'Trust and communications between management and workers increase productivity'. Furthermore, the data was analysed using the principal components method of factor analysis. Of the 11 extracted factors, only five were considered, while the others were dropped since the observed variables had low loadings on these factors. Contractors and officials can benefit from this study in understanding factors affecting productivity, and act upon that understanding.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction labour; factor analysis; Jordan; labour productivity
Index terms: questionnaire, developing country, financial incentive, profit, survey, construction labour, factor analysis, labour productivity, loading, Jordan, dimension, case study, deviation, productivity, engineer
Subjects: management, development economics, Geography, statistical analysis, data collection methods, profession, financial and cost management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, construction operations
Topics: International Construction, Site Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here