Holt, G D and Goulding, J S (2016) Positioning construction businesses on an 'evolution‒innovation' continuum: Conceptualization of the 'equivocal zone'. International Journal of Construction Management, 16(3), pp. 220-233. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The concepts of 'business evolution' and 'innovative business endeavour' are contrasted as bipolar extremes on a theoretical continuum: first in the context of organizations generally and second for construction businesses specifically. This highlights what the authors define as an 'equivocal zone' (EZ), which occupies a wide section of the continuum and is positioned approximately equidistant from its extremes. Cogent representation of the zone is based on literature synthesis, emphasizing contemporary and emergent viewpoints in the field; while its conceptualization is achieved using descriptive and graphical models. The study argues that within the EZ, definitions of organizational innovation often become blurred and that the EZ characterizes most construction organizations on the evolution‒innovation continuum. The EZ is a new theoretical concept derived solely from this study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business evolution; business; relationships; construction organizations; innovation; performance |
| Index terms: | organizational innovation, construction organization, evolution |
| Subjects: | organization, environmental science, business |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 P |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here