Liu, C and Zhu, R (2017) Measuring output structures of multinational construction industries using the world input-output database. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(1), pp. 1-12. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
In the context of international movement towards trade liberalization, increasing technological progress, open competition and social development have impacted deeply on the construction industry in all economies. Using the World Input–Output Database (WIOD), a multinational comparison of the construction industry is estimated from 1995 to 2011 to provide accurate and valid information on the changing patterns of its output structure. The output coefficients for 37 countries and regions are formulated to allow for inter-industry comparisons and to identify the major components of construction output. Changes of output structure are then elaborated over time across countries and regions. The research findings presented in this paper would provide a framework for identifying the output structure of a nation's construction industry and its change trends at an international level, which may help policymakers and enterprises with the formulation of their future development strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cross-national analysis; input–output analysis; output structure |
| Index terms: | construction output, competition, strategy, movement, construction industry, liberalization, database |
| Subjects: | management, industry analysis, data management, market analysis, health behaviours and lifestyles, economic analysis, operations management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here