Perceptions of risk allocation methods and equitable risk distribution: A study of medium to large southeast Queensland commercial construction projects

Perez, D; Gray, J and Skitmore, M (2017) Perceptions of risk allocation methods and equitable risk distribution: A study of medium to large southeast Queensland commercial construction projects. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(2), pp. 132-141. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Economic upheaval and project complexity often lead to unequal risk allocation between contractual parties. A review of the literature identifies major problems in relation to the fairness and equality of the risk allocation process. However, most existing studies have been conducted from the client's perspective rather than that of contractors or consultants and do not focus specifically on risk misallocation. This paper aims at determining the factors involved by a questionnaire survey of the perceptions of contractors and consultants of the main issues in relation to medium to large commercial construction projects in South East Queensland, Australia. The findings are generally consistent with existing research results in that approximately half the respondents feel that their contractual risk allocation is unfair. In addition, there is a lack of use of formal risk management methods, and the arbitrary passing down of risks from the client has increased in recent years. A better understanding is provided of the issues contributing to unequal risk allocation, decision-making and management that will help promote fairness and equality between the contractual parties in the current process of risk management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractor; fairness; risk allocation; unequal
Index terms: Queensland, survey, questionnaire, decision-making, project complexity, Australia, commercial construction, risk management, risk allocation, fairness
Subjects: data collection methods, risk assessment, construction type, decision analysis, leadership, organizational theory, Geography, financial risk
Topics: Risk Management, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here