Safa, M; Shahi, A; Haas, C T and Hipel, K W (2017) Construction contract management using value packaging systems. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(1), pp. 50-64. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
In large construction projects, optimally dividing, packaging, and awarding the work amongst contractors and suppliers can be challenging. Typically, this procurement process is executed in the pre-construction phase based on the experience and judgement of the project leadership team. Once procurement is completed, it is difficult to demonstrate whether the results of this process are optimal, or to explain the rationale behind decision making. An auditable and robust method is needed to address these issues, while still taking into account the expertise of the project leadership team. Thus, a comprehensive construction value packaging system (CVPS) is presented which serves as a computational and process environment for assisting project leaders by increasing the efficiency, auditability, and effectiveness of the procurement process. The development of this system requires a new concept to be defined, the construction value unit (VU), whose scope covers value-added work defined by type of activity, its stage in the value chain, and its specifications. Construction value packages are composed of VUs. Research findings demonstrate that the VPS has the potential to improve the contract management of an enterprise-wide construction supply chain.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction supply chain; construction value packaging system; construction value unit; contract management; decision making |
| Index terms: | pre-construction, construction contract, effectiveness, efficiency, package, decision-making, large construction project, value chain, construction supply chain, procurement process, contract management, specification |
| Subjects: | organizational theory, value chain strategy, contractual arrangements, project delivery, contractual condition, contract type, decision analysis, contract management, construction logistics, performance management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Project Management, Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here